Chappell ‘close’ but not DUI, GSP says
by John P. Boan/Times-Georgian
12 months ago | 3241 views | 29 29 comments | 55 55 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Chappell.mp4
Chappell.mp4
Carroll County Commission Chairman Bill Chappell narrowly avoided being arrested late Thursday night, July 9, for driving under the influence of alcohol.

Chappell was released with no charges filed, having registered a blood-alcohol content less than .01 below the legal limit, according to the Georgia State Patrol, but the video taken from a state trooper’s dashboard camera shows a man unable to walk a straight line or stand on one leg.

Ultimately, that same trooper followed Chappell the less than 2 miles to his house to ensure he made it home safely.

The roadblock stop occurred before midnight on July 9 at the intersection of Highway 5 and Duncan Road in unincorporated Carroll County, according to Joey Boatright, commander of the Georgia State Patrol’s Villa Rica post. The copy of the video, obtained by the Times-Georgian through a Freedom of Information Act request, contains no time stamp, and there is no report documenting the time of the stop, leaving the exact time which the incident occurred in question.

Lt. Paul Cosper, public information officer with the state patrol, could not say why the tape lacked a clear time stamp and said he was not able to verify the specific time of the incident until he returned to work Thursday.

According to the tape, Chappell said he was returning home from a regional development council meeting in Greenville, the county seat of Meriwether County. Following the meeting’s end at 8:30 p.m., he stopped and had one cocktail before making a second stop at a convenience store for a Diet Coke, Chappell said Wednesday. He then drove home, running into the joint state patrol and Carroll County Sheriff’s Office roadblock near his house on Hamp Chappell Road, Chappell said.

The first audio of the video begins with Trooper Mike Land asking Chappell “What time did you have your drink?” The tape is silent for nearly a minute leading up to this exchange, though video is still present. The explanation given by the state patrol for any redaction in the audio portion of the tape is that it was done to protect any medical information Chappell was providing to the trooper.

On the video, Chappell explains to Land that he had a drink following the meeting he was attending, at which point the trooper asks Chappell if he can “check his eyes,” or perform a standard field Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, which serves to detect involuntary eye movements associated with the consumption of alcohol. Land performs this test on Chappell for nearly two and a half minutes.

During this process, Chappell comments that the flashlight is “hypnotizing,” and several times Land tells Chappell to only follow the light with his eyes and not turn his entire head.

According to Cosper, this test is the most accurate of all field sobriety tests, including the Alco-Sensor test, which serves as a portable Breathalyzer. The trooper noted from this test only two confirmations out of a possible three that Chappell’s blood alcohol was above the legal limit of .08 percent or higher, Cosper said. For this reason, the test was deemed inconclusive.

Following this initial test, Land asks Chappell if he is on any medication. For 45 seconds, the audio is once again silent while Chappell describes the medications he is taking.

“None of those medications affected Mr. Chappell’s ability to drive a car,” Cosper said.

On the tape, Land then administers the second field sobriety test, asking Chappell to take nine steps along a white line before turning around and taking nine steps in return. Before doing so, Chappell says “My balance is terrible.” He then proceeds to attempt to walk the line. His legs shake violently, causing him to nearly fall down to his left, and after overcorrecting, he falls off the line again to his right, reaching out to the side of his truck for support. Walking back, Chappell again falls from the line to both sides, finishing next to the trooper with both feet off the line.

“I couldn’t walk that line any time,” Chappell said on Wednesday. “I’d have a better time doing that if I’d have had a drink.”

In the video, Chappell then begins to cough loudly, and Land asks him he if he is all right, to which Chappell replies “yeah, I just got ...” and the sound is once again redacted.

The sound returns, and Land asks Chappell to stand on one foot with the other raised 6 inches off the ground, counting each second out loud. Chappell is only able to do so for less than 2 seconds at a time, his legs once again shaking beneath him.

Cosper would not say whether Chappell’s failure to walk a straight line or stand on one foot constituted a failure of those specific field sobriety tests, and he attributed Chappell’s struggles with the test to an unnamed “medical condition,” his weight and his age.

“The trooper didn’t feel that Mr. Chappell was over the influence at the time. He didn’t feel like he was over the influence,” Cosper said. “He said he was close but he wasn’t over the limit.”

Following the third test, Land goes to his car and retrieves the Alco-Sensor test and asks Chappell to blow. According to the video, Land says Chappell blew too hard and that the test did not register. Upon a second administration of the test, Land comments that Chappell blew .071 percent, .009 away from being above the legal limit for alcohol.

“All right Mr. Chappell. We’re going to let you ride tonight,” Land says, having returned to his car. “Let me tell you something, though, you were real close tonight.”

Chappell replies, “What was I?” Land tells him, to which Chappell says, “Oh really?”

Land said “Yes sir. You were one point off from being .08, which would have been over the limit. Try to take care next time and be careful ... if you plan on drinking before you drive.”

According to the video, Chappell then says, “I wouldn’t [inaudible]. I wouldn’t do that.”

In the video, Chappell then gets in his car, and Land into his. Chappell pulls away, and Land begins to follow Chappell home..

Cosper said it is not unusual for troopers to follow someone home if they’re concerned about the health of that person. Chappell had expressed to Land he had a medical condition and was having trouble breathing, and for this reason, Cosper said, Land made the decision to follow him home.

On the video, as he is pulling away from the checkpoint, Land says into the radio, “I’m going to follow Mr. Chappell. He’s not .. He blew a .071. I know he don’t live but a half a mile down the road. Just to be on safety’s sake, I’m going to follow him down, make sure he makes it home OK.”
comments (29)
« lita34 wrote on Wednesday, Jul 22 at 07:12 PM »
Good question Carroll Resident! Now, my question for the Chappell Fan Club, or several questions as it may be. With the recent events, are you all still firmly in his corner? Does this not remind you of all the TV Shows that portray a local, hick, politician throwing his weight around -- no pun intended? On to another question. Do any of you bother to check out www.carrollgeorgia.com? There is an article on 05/17/2009 Titled "The Fire That Fueled The Firing". For any in doubt regarding Mr. Chappell and his nefarious methods, I highly recommend reading this. Mr. Chappell is using his elected, public office, to follow thru with his personal vendetta's. For those who might not know, evidently it was a suspicion of a meth lab by nephew of Mr. Boss Hog, Bill Chappell, that caused a fire to Chappell Family Property. While there was no "clear cause" there was the suspicion of drug activity as a possible cause. Is this not the "good ol boy network" at it's best, ahem, worst? Didn't Mr. Chappell himself not say "no more good ol boy tactics" yet he uses his position to terminate HONEST, ETHICAL, HARD WORKING, people? Now, to top it all off, he drives while clearly under the influence and risks danger to himself and his "constituents." Sad thing is, in most cases it's the drunk driver that walks and his/her victim that does not. Let's do our job, LET'S FIRE BILL!!!!
« Carroll Resident wrote on Sunday, Jul 19 at 09:15 AM »
I have a question that I would like for someone to help me with... Since Mr Chappell was on the way home from a meeting in Greenville in a county funded car, would Carroll County not be liable if he were to hit someone after one of his "bar trips"? I know that Mr Chappell actually owns this car and bills the county $400 a month for use of his own car and uses county gas. So if he were to hit someone, do you not think that they would come after Carroll County?

I still can not believe that he gets away with not driving a car that is paid for by the county and gets $400 a month, all because he is too good for the one that is provided for him!
« audjas wrote on Friday, Jul 17 at 07:07 AM »
hey bill three words for you. BLOW, BLOW, BLOW. I will be buying the star news just to see if the story makes the paper. my life was changed in 1985 by a drunk driver when i was ten years old. you should be ashamed of yourself.
« templetiger wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 10:10 PM »
What kind of example is this man setting for the young people of Carroll County? He couldn't even wait until he got home before getting into the bottle! Lot's of bars between his meeting and home - not. If the GSP had checked his diet coke, there might have been an open container charge as well. We will never see any acknowledgement from our chairman or appology. Pull the old Tim Bearden trick and just pretend it never happened and make no comment. Great job guys! Still proud to be from Carroll County in spite of the idiots we elected.
« kag0985 wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 09:47 PM »
This makes me furious! My husband got stopped after dinner one night and went to jail before ever doing any testing on the roadside and when he got to the Carroll county jail he blew a .074 and they still gave him a DUI. He went to court and they dropped it down to wreck less driving, but guess what were still out of pocket about $2500. SO YOU TELL ME, DO WE DO MORE FOR MEN OF THE LAW?? LOL! THEY SHOULD HAVE NEVER LET HIM DRIVE HOME! HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT IN JAIL AND THE SAME THING DONE TO HIM. DON'T YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL MR. CHAPPELL!!!
« I wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 09:41 PM »
Mr. Chappell should not be drinking and driving. The video is hard to see, but it appears to me that his feet walked a straight line with his upper body moving side to side. I think this may be why troopers took him home. Got no dog in this fight, but watch what you can actually see and notice his feet stay on the line and his upper body bobbing side to side. He has made questionable decisions, but he was not over the legal limit, and is entitled to protection under the law as anyone else. If a set up, he would have been arrested if there were legal grounds. From a political position I understand this story. At the end of the day, there is nothing to report other than this is a true political story.
« Dwightshrute wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 09:02 PM »
my son said today he wanted to drink and drive so he could be like bill chappell.
« ChristiW wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 08:50 PM »
“I’d have a better time doing that if I’d have had a drink.”

LIAR!! HE HAD BEEN.

DRINK UP!!

IM GLAD U GOT STOPPED

« ChristiW wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 08:47 PM »
sounds like the officer was making SURE he passed the DUI TEST. HOW MANY TESTS WERE GIVEN????
« ChristiW wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 08:45 PM »
Try to take care next time and be careful ... if you plan on drinking before you drive.”

What good advice from the officer!

« doubleb wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 08:21 PM »
.As citizens where do we draw the line? We have laws. We are governed by them and have responsibility to follow them. Those who swear to serve and protect must follw the same guidelines, don't they? Obviously, it appears many are saddened that this guy wasn't thrown under the jail. I don't know maybe he just isn't well liked. But the fact remains he wasn't over the legal limit. Pure and simple. The officer made a call based on evidence and experience. You don't like it? Change the law. But until then it's refreshing to know that people aren't jailed because they aren't thought highly of by others. If that were the case, Obama would be in my jail today. I'm glad the law isn't predicated on my likes or dislikes and I'm just as glad this officer followed his oath. Had it gone the other way and he was jailed while under the legal limit, what would we be saying then. I'm just glad to see a little common sense being displayed.
« stopyou wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 05:12 PM »
First, I think it is ridiculous that this story made the paper. He didn't blow over the limit, plain and simple. He appears to not be the healthiest of seniors, clearly overweight with some medical issues and I think it is completely fair to weigh that in to the equation when determining whether or not someone is or is not over the limit.

What is so entertaining about all of this is how his "supporters" come here blabbing in full-drama form, completely dismissing the fact that Mr. Chappell has been behind so many slanderous lies published in STAR--as if they never existed. Or maybe as if the Times-Georgian crossed some imaginary line that STAR would never dare cross and this is your outlet for letting people know how shameful that is.

It is disappointing, frustrating, and even downright scary that that such ignorant people actually influence our communities.

Don't forget to renew your subscription of The National Enquirer; it contains critical information you'll need to make informed decisions about our future.
« ??2009?? wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 04:05 PM »
I am a firm believer in "what goes around-comes around." Looks like the star news has met it's match! Guess now you know how it feels Bill!
« ??2009?? wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 04:04 PM »
I am a firm believer in "what goes around-comes around." Looks like the star news has met it's match! Guess now you know how it feels Bill!
« Stacy18bl wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 03:50 PM »
The only thing that really matters even if he wasn't legally drunk, is that he consumed alcohol and then chose to drive. As a responsible citizen who values life and the lives of others, you don't do that - much less a person who is in a leadership position. You put not only your life but any one else you encounter at risk. All it takes is one mistake and it could be fatal for someone. I personally wouldn't want to be on the road with Mr. Chappell or any one else that was driving while/after drinking. It's not safe.

If you don't have a problem with Mr. Chappell's driving habits, by all means - put your and your loved ones lives in his hands by driving in his vicinity when he is drinking and driving then let us know how that works for you.

How can we as a county want him to represent us in this manner? What does that say to others thinking of moving here, or possibly even thinking of sending their children here for College? It says that our County Commissioner - the man who controls our county's money and makes decisions for our county also thinks it's ok to have a drink then get behind the wheel and drive.

« justanotherdupe wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 03:36 PM »
Bill Chappell, shame on you. I remember when the formaer city manager of Villa Rica, Steve Russell was charged with DUI. You and your paper covered him like a sausage wrapper. Now, from the video, you did the same. I watched the video. I know the instructions given to you, for I have done that job. I do not care if the portable aclo-sensor said .071, all I can say is you were under the influence, and the trooper cut you a break. He used his discretion because either he didn't want to actually have to "make" the case, or he didn't want the political fallout. No offense to the trooper, but did you offer to pay him off also?

Bill Chappell, if I had stopped you in my jurisdiction (back when I was a cop), and demonstrated those characteristics, you WOULD have been arrested and charged. When someone "flies the airplane" on the one leg stand, and/or can't take 9 steps in a straight line, dude, you were drunk. Period. I don't care what the alco sensor said because you set those instuments with a screw driver. Been there. Done that.

You drunk moron.

« anonfireguy wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 02:48 PM »
i swear to GOD i am tired of ll the retards who cannot figure out that he is a degenerative drunk...if this was a single isolated incident, there would not be deputies waiting around for him every time drinks...its common knowledge he drinks and drives.... he is just lucky it was GSP and not a deputy....if it was CCSO... he would be still trying to bond out
« Anti Bill wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 12:38 PM »
cmarlar; sounds just like a lawyer! I didn't know that the GSP, County or City needed permission to setup roadblocks! But I am sure that you are one of the ambulance chasers that protect drunks, drugies and other guilty criminals. You find a legal loophole in the system and they are back on the streets doing it again. Then they go on and commit the crime again and hit some innocent person. You should be proud of you’re work after winning cases like that! I didn’t think that it would take Bill the town drunk’s attorney to post on here.
« locallawyer wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 12:30 PM »
Dear "cmarlar" - questions are only "stupid" if you don't want them answered. The earlier writer makes a valid point. This "news tip" did not come from a scanner; it came from within the GSP to a "friend"; meaning, this "incident" was a targeted set-up. Clearly, the County Chairman is being stalked and targeted. "Friends" are at work here and a good legal probing will expose them. GSP will also be liable for the mis-deeds of their troopers.
« cmarlar wrote on Thursday, Jul 16 at 11:59 AM »


1. How did the Times-Georgian know to file an Open Records Request of the Georgia State Patrol for this particular tape?

Most news agencey's keep scanners on hand to listen to LE. I doubt the TG does that, but a person who did hear it on a scanner probably called them.

2. Since this incident happened only 6 days prior - when did the TG file this Open Records Request?

The TG does this all the time. You have 3 days to respond to a ORR. Its been 6 days.

3. How did this request get processed so quickly? Particularly, when there were audio redactions that had to be made to protect the medical privacy rights of Mr. Chappell. Try making an Open Records Request and see how quickly any state agency processes it.

Again, three days to respond. You can do amazing things with digital technology. If Chappell has medical reasons preventing him from particpating in Field Sobriety test, all he had to do was make the statment. A one legged man does not have to perform the walk-a-straight-line sobriety test.

4. Apparently, the TG gets their "news" from a local tabloid web site (who ran this "story" first) so the better question is how and when did the local tabloid site know to file and Open Records Request for this particular incident? You need to ask the other tabloid. This is a stupid question.

5. Has the GSP operated roadblocks at this site before or was this site and Mr. Chappell being targeted? If so, why? They can operate a road block anywhere they want to. They are the GSP! Another stupid question.

6. Isn't it true that the roadblock site was shutdown and abandoned last Thursday night AFTER Mr. Chappell was stopped and why was this so?

Is there a rule that says once you atart a RB, that it can never end? And does it really matter. LE can target criminal activity...and drinking under the influence is criminal activity. A road block should not be a problem to a driver that is is not drinking. Really good question though!

7. Who within the GSP leaked and notified certain friends about the video tape? Isn't this leaking a violation of GSP Rules and Procedures?

All GSP traffic stops are recorded. They have been recording traffic stops for a while now. ITS NOT A SECRET. Stupid question, again